The ECOWAS Court of Justice has upheld the removal of former Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo, ruling that the process leading to her dismissal complied with the principles of fair hearing and due process.
In its judgement, the court found that the procedures followed by the relevant authorities did not violate the applicant’s rights under regional legal standards. The court concluded that Torkonoo was afforded an adequate opportunity to respond to the allegations against her and participate in the proceedings.
The ruling delivered on Wednesday, June 24, 2026, represents a significant setback for Justice Torkonoo, who had turned to the regional court to contest the process that led to her removal from office.
The case attracted significant public attention, with legal experts, civil society organisations, and political observers closely monitoring the outcome due to its implications for judicial independence and constitutional governance.
Torkonoo had challenged her removal before the ECOWAS Court, arguing that the process was flawed and infringed upon her right to a fair hearing. However, the regional tribunal determined that the evidence presented did not support claims of procedural unfairness.
The ruling reinforces the importance of established constitutional and legal mechanisms in addressing matters involving senior judicial officers. The court emphasised that while a fair hearing is a fundamental right, it must be assessed within the context of the procedures prescribed by law and the facts of each case.
The decision marks a significant chapter in one of the most closely watched legal and constitutional disputes in recent years, bringing clarity to the regional court’s position on due process and fair hearing in high-profile public office cases.
SOURCE: Newscenta